Monday, December 8, 2014

The Clemson CRIPmas Party: a response from a Pro-Black Girl alum.

In case you don’t watch CNN or FOX News, my dear old alma mater is in trouble, its students accused of throwing racially insensitive holiday parties. No, I'm not talking about the Blackface Party Fiasco of 2007. I’m talking about CRIPmas 2014, otherwise known as Clemson’s second major (reported) racial incident in less than 10 years. Sigma Alpha Epsilon, an SAE fraternity, threw their annual “CRIPmas Party”, where frat members and sundry sororities get together in their best Gangsta Themed clothes, sing along to Biggie Smalls albums, and play beer pong. Or, you know, whatever it is that they do at those types of frat parties. I never went to any because you don’t always have to bite the donut to know that it’s sweet.

Or, in this case, you don’t have to go to the party to know that you really don’t belong there. I'm not a party girl in general, but racist frat functions definitely aren't my cup of tea. These good ol’ Clemson kids certainly seem to like them though. After all, it’s an annual CRIPmas Party. And then there was the aforementioned Blackface Party Fiasco of 2007. And all those lovely Yik Yak posts about the Die-In protests last week. You know which ones I’m talking about. “Stay safe, blacks are attacking whites nation wide.” Whites a minority?! Haha. We’ll always been the superiority.” “Clemson used to be a plantation with slaves. Atleast be happy we gave u freedom[.]”

Nothing will show the character of an entire geographical region like anonymous social mobile apps, amirite? Thanks, Yik Yak!!

And what does Jim Clements, Clemson’s newish president, do in the face of this ignorance and poor grammar/syntax? He writes a little letter and puts it on the school website, wherein he basically says, “Guys, this is bad, okay? But y’all need to calm down about Ferguson. And Eric Garner. Let’s not get violent here.” I would say I’m disappointed, but I knew that blame-shift was coming. ...nah, I’m still disappointed. He started out so well! And begging your pardon, Jimbo, but disenfranchised white boys upset that they couldn't play ultimate frisbee on Bowman because of die-in protesters drew first blood with, “Damnet do I have to put a sheet on and go scare the people in front of Tillman away[?]” That sounds like violence to me. Did y'all know that intimidation is a crime punishable by up to 30 days in prison under the South Carolina Code of Law? Because it is!

I’m going to be real with y’all, if that’s alright. Is anyone really surprised that this happened? Because I’m not. Clemson has been wiggling its way out of messy hate crime allegations for a long, long time. They’re old pros at this by now. Same shtick, different day. Tomato. To-mah-tah. To-mah-to?

“Now Lyssa,” you may be saying, “dressing up and having a party is not a hate crime. You might be offended, but it’s not a hate crime,” to which I say, isn’t it? This CRIPmas Party is basically a form of Black minstrelsy. You know what Black minstrelsy is? It’s a type of “performance art” used by white people to mock and otherwise demean Black people and Black culture. The most common form of this is what we know as blackface, and I think that mostly* everyone agrees that that’s bad. It’s psychologically damaging, promotes negative stereotypes of the Black community, and bolsters beliefs of white superiority. In short, Black minstrelsy is a racialized form of violence, and do you know what racially based violence is? That’s right, my friend. That’s a hate crime.

“Lyssa,” you may now be saying, “no one was actually in blackface!” To this I say, “Oh, I’m sorry. I didn’t know that you were thinking of white people every time you heard the word Crip/Blood/Folk. My mistake. Do carry on with your day.”

Sip on that tea for a minute. Or, if you need something stronger, keep reading.

I’ll be fair. It’s not just the SAE, IFC, and NPC men and women running around campus with their TuPac t-shirts and fake butts in miniskirts and brown face paint, though they’re the best hands down at getting caught. Bravo, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Alpha Phi, and all other Greek-lettered individuals who actually participated in this disgusting display on being a disgrace to all of us Greeks and on being so spectacularly mediocre. But this is not your burden alone. I had plenty of self-proclaimed liberal, GDI white friends in college who voted for Obama in 2008 and were also low-key racist and full of microaggressions. My homeboy that “wasn’t attracted to Black girls” (a problematic statement in and of itself, but we won't talk about that today) had an undeniable crush on one of my few Black girl friends that he denied every chance he got. Another guy I knew didn’t see a problem at all with The Blackface Party Fiasco of 2007, because, you know, “people dress up as rich old white guys all the time.” He was on student council. I used to see my friend’s parents, Clemson alums themselves, on campus at sporting events I attended with him; they were very nice, but later my friend would chuckle as he told me how his dad had asked him, “You’re not dating That Black Girl, are you?” after I left. I knew 2 guys who made jokes about Black people being on tv because it was MLK Day. One told me I was “being too sensitive” when I called him on it the next day (a staple retort learned in Racism 101), yet still thought he was better than his sister who thought that “only a fully white person should be president.” An RA from another floor once talked to my RA and some others about a white girl she knew that went by “Gel” instead of Angelica. “Are you sure she wasn’t Black?” because that’s an easy thing to mix up, and then, “Shh! A Black girl lives right there!” They were standing outside my door. There was also the staff who never went forward when I reported being called “the dark one” and other racist names by my friends’ RA who couldn’t seem to decide if he hated my Black guts or wanted to notch his belt with me, and then just decided to multitask. My friends thought he was funny. One friend who met my family later only seemed to remember how, “It’s so funny how all of you say ‘Mmmhmmm chil'!’" And those are just the ones I care to make examples of right now. There are plenty more.

You want names? Come talk to me. I’ll give them to you. I keep my receipts.

Like I said. This isn't just a Greek Life problem. It is fundamentally a Clemson University problem because these people were RAs, student council members, student organization leaders, and athletes. This whole “One Clemson” family thing is a lie. There is Black Clemson, and White Clemson, and Sri Lankan Clemson, and Korean Clemson; White Greek Clemson, Black Greek Clemson, Service Frat Clemson, and a lot of other Clemsons, plus a few brave souls who dare cross the lines outside of class. Let us not forgot that Clemson doesn’t have the greatest history with race relations in general, no matter how hard they push Harvey Gantt in our faces. Talk to your elders from the area and see what they tell you. Read a book. Google it. Remember: Clemson was founded on plantation land by a plantation owner’s son-in-law who was so influenced by Benjamin Tillman--a US Senator that did some cool stuff for agriculture, I guess, but who was directly responsible for a lot of white supremacist legislature and a vocal proponent of Lynch Laws and Jim Crow--that he made him a chairman of the (then) college and named the clock tower after him. You know the clock tower. It's that pretty red brick building you see on all the commercials and postcards and paintings.

Do you see what I’m saying? Respect for Black students isn’t in Clemson’s culture. It wasn’t there from the very beginning, and many of the non-Black students that the school attracts act accordingly. This bigotry was put in between the brick and mortar of Tillman Hall itself. It is a vicious cycle of hate and iniquity that dies with every graduation ceremony and is reborn with each incoming freshman class. Jim Clements thinks that Clemson is “better than this,” but is it? Is it really? Because this seems to keep happening, and it’s not those same kids from 2007 that are making it so.

Here's some more realness for you. I’m both a pro-Black girl and pro-Black girl. This does not mean that I am anti-non-Black, anti-white, anti-Black man, etc. It means, in the words of  Malcolm X, that I am Black first. My sympathies are Black, my allegiances are Black, my whole objectives are Black. I’ve been a pro-Black girl so hard and for so long that in high school when I asked for college recommendations my French teacher wrote that I was “dedicated to disproving stereotypes.” I’m so staunchly pro-Black that when I studied abroad one of my professors approached me about helping him teach a two-part seminar on Black History in the United States (and I did). It is because I am a pro-Black girl that I cannot like Clemson University, much less love it. How dare I love a place that hates me, and still claim to love myself? The short answer is that I can’t. The long answer is this:

I do not want to sing your football chants, I do not want to rub your rock, I do not want to go to your alumni parties (will there be blackface there too?), I do not want to wear orange on Fridays. It makes me physically ill to set foot in that godforsaken hill country where the Blue Ridge yawns “I’m racist!” Let me be plain: I hate that place as much as I love myself and my people. It’s not a safe, healthy, or good environment for our Black and brown children to enter into, and honestly I mistrust any Black or brown person that likes the orange and purple too much. That means I give a lot of side-eye at a lot of people I love. I give it to some of my former classmates, to my friends, my sorors, my old professors, my uncles, to anyone with a paw print or orange flags flying on their car. I pity their babies with their big purple bows and little orange overalls and their cheerleader outfits at tailgates. My Black children, who will be Black to this country regardless as to whether or not their other parent is Black, white, Thai, Montenegrin, or Indigenous Australian, will not be Clemson alums, so help me God. I will not take them on walks around Bowman Field, or to 55 Exchange for ice cream; they will not come with me to homecoming because I will not be going. Not when it is my job to protect them. Not if I don’t want them to look back on their college years like I do: with bitterness and hate and regret.

Some time this week, I am finding out who to call to get my name off of the alumni donation solicitations list and I’m calling them. I’ll even ask them nicely to take me off. I only ever throw that stuff in the trash anyway.

If Clemson doesn’t want to respect or value my Black personhood, they sure as hell don’t deserve my Black money.

10 comments:

  1. Man, no offense, but you need to chill. I am a graduate student here at Clemson. I went to a high school that was 50% white, 40% black, and 10% hispanic. I don't sympathize with the greeks or particularly like them at all. So what if these frat kids feel the need to be particularly stupid? They haven’t made me feel particularly welcome, either. Look at any large university here in the south, and you're going to find this type of stuff. But instead of bitching about it (as you do in your article), I choose to have a different attitude. Next semester, I will personally work with all of our students (particularly those that are African American) to ensure that Clemson is a welcoming place for everyone. Also, as far as Clements goes, the dude spent 3 hours of his sunday morning LISTENING to students that were out on library bridge. He sat down in the library and heard what they had to say. What other university president would ACTUALLY do that? Check out this pic. https://twitter.com/ZoelStackHouse/status/541642925994962944 After I graduate from Clemson, I plan to give back to this university in the form of scholarships. One will be for a student who has a GPA UNDER a 3.0 (imagine that). The other will be for a minority student who comes from a low income family. Also, you actually griped about yik yak in your article. That app is not a legitimate form of communication. As an example, something unfortunate recently happened to a sorority girl round these parts, and the trolls came out in full force. If you haven't already learned, the internet is filled with trolls who will say hurtful things. Heck, you can't play a multiplayer game on Xbox live without hearing trolls say mean and insensitive things. I’m sorry, but that type of issue is everywhere. Come to think of it, i’m pretty sure that countless high schools across America are having issues with yik yak. Also, if you hang around that app long enough, I guarantee you will find something that offends you, no matter who you are.

    Your article ends with indignation and a disavowing of everything that is Clemson. My comment ends with a promise for dialogue and change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First thank you for your response. You've clearly put a lot of thought into this. I can appreciate that. There are a lot of things that I could comment about here, but I'm just going to focus on a few.

      Don't come on my blog telling me to "chill." There's a little button with an "X" in the corner of your browser; use it. The problem is that it isn't at "any large university in the south," as you say. Google the "Compton Cookout" at UCSD. Remind me, where is California? This is a nationwide issue, but I didn't go to those schools. I went to Clemson. And I think it's a generally better to write about what you know.

      Secondly, I think you might have misunderstood my comments about Yik Yak. To say that I'm "griping" about it would suggest that I'm finding fault with the app itself. I'm not mad at Yik Yak or the people that made it. I'm mad at the people using it to spread foolishness and hate speech. And if Yik Yak, which is basically a message board that caters to anonymous posters, is an imperfect medium of communication... Check your comment. Because I don't see your name either.

      Also I'm gleaning from your comments that you're not a minority, and therefore have no idea what it's like to be a non-white person at school with more than 80% white students. My honest opinion? I don't need white people OR non-Black people telling me how to feel about Black issues. And I don't need you derailing this important discourse to talk about yourself. You're not like *those guys*, right? Then this shouldn't bother you at all.

      Basically you're ignoring over a lot of historical fact and credible references to tell me to "chill" and quit bitching. That's a lot of words to tell me not to be such an Angry Black Woman. I didn't have that much time when I was in grad school.

      Do not come for me unless I send for you.

      Delete
  2. Dear OP,

    I am an African American student currently enrolled at Clemson who is working with my community to create the positive change that we want to see on campus. That being said, please, please, please, take a step back, educate yourself, and really evaluate your intentions to help "particularly African American students" next semester. From the tone and content of your response to this blogger's personal take on current events, I can tell that your privilege is something that you have not accepted or even addressed yet. What we don't need is a white savior, and if you approach our efforts with that mentality we will surely send you in the opposite direction

    We appreciate and even encourage non-black students to help us combat the negative campus climate. If you are willing to learn (and let me assure you, your arrogance shows that there is some learning to be done) how to be an effective and supportive ally, please don't hesitate to contact me at navila@g.clemson.edu

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. Let me preface this by saying I am not affiliated with Greek Life nor am I defending the frats that hosted the party.

    2. The way you talk about President Clements is very disrespectful. As hard as it may be to believe, this won't be fixed overnight, or in a week, or maybe even in a month. This will take time and I'm sure President Clements is doing everything he can to make sure this problem is fixed as soon as possible.

    3. Using yik yak as a source is like using Wikipedia on a college paper. It's a joke. Those people are trolls; they'll post anything to get a rise out of people. I could go on there and say that all Middle Eastern students are members of ISIS, that doesn't make it true. If you want to use social media as a source use twitter, because people can't hide behind their anonymity. I have seen numerous tweets posted by blacks that were incredibly insensitive towards whites, including several about 1 of our deceased Clemson students. Others said simply "I hate white ppl". But those are fine because they were "provoked" by the actions of a fraternity (sarcasm). Which brings me to my next point.

    4. I don't understand how a gangster party is racist. Every St. Patrick's Day, people all across the country wear green and drink beer all day long and we never hear Irish people complain about being offended. Every Thanksgiving, elementary schools all over the country host Thanksgiving Day plays and all the kids dress up as Pilgrims and Indians, and those kids aren't accused of being insensitive towards the Indians. Both examples are exclusive to only 1 group. Gangs are not exclusive to 1 race; in fact, the majority of gang members aren't even black, they're Hispanic/Latino (http://www.nationalgangcenter.gov/survey-analysis/demographics). So how can blacks be so upset about a party when the theme isn't even exclusive to blacks? It would be like me being upset that Clemson's football team has more blacks than whites. Ridiculous, right?

    5. You said that Clemson was founded by racists. I've seen multiple people say that Tillman Hall should be torn down because of its name and, although you didn't say it, I'm assuming you agree with them. News flash, this is the south. Everybody in the south in the 1800s was either a racist or a slave. You'd be hard-pressed to find a school south of the Mason-Dixon Line that wasn't founded by racists. That was 200 years ago. We can't change history, no matter how upset you are about it, but to say that we should tear down the most iconic building on campus just because of its name is stupid.

    6. To continue point 4, so what if some college kids got together wearing baggy clothes and bandanas for a party? Do you really think they thought, "this theme could be racist"? No, they thought, "this will be a fun theme that will be easy to dress up for and Cripmas sounds like Christmas." Just like nobody thinks, "I hope Greeks don't find this offensive" as they wrap themselves in a bed sheet and head off to a toga party. Nobody threw this party intending to offend anyone. Was it the best theme given the current events in our country? No, but that doesn't make the people at the party racist and it certainly doesn't make every white student at Clemson racist.

    7. "It means, in the words of Malcolm X, that I am Black first. My sympathies are Black, my allegiances are Black, my whole objectives are Black." Why is it ok for you to make statements like this and nobody assumes that you're racist, but I can't say the same about being white? I love being white. That DOESN'T mean that I hate blacks, but if I say that then people assume that I'm racist, privileged bigot.

    8. Finally, I love Clemson University. I love every single student and faculty member of Clemson University because I consider each one of them family, regardless of race, gender, whatever. We are family. We may be broken at the moment, but we're still family.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I read through my comment, I realize that I may not have conveyed my message as well as I would have liked. I am impartial to both sides of the debate, because I believe that both sides are right and wrong to a degree. All I want is for this issue to be resolved and both sides to be happy once again.

      The purpose of my original comment was to play devil's advocate, to provide you with the viewpoints of the opposing end of the debate, although some of my statements may have come off as harsh and defensive. Hopefully, you will understand that I intended nothing but respect towards you and your opinions.

      Delete
    2. I'm glad you realized that your first comment wasn't conveyed the way you wanted it to be.

      At first I was going to seriously sit down, go through your comments with a fine-toothed comb and spend a lot of time in my life that I'm never going to get back responding. But then you outright admitted to "playing the devil's advocate," and that tells me that you don't take your argument seriously so I don't have to either. And even if you weren't, you made statements that were so egregiously ignorant in that first comment that there's no way this could have ended nicely between us.

      You are the second white man, Grant, to come onto this blog and make this conversation about yourself and "What about the white people???" at large. I'm sensing a pattern here that I don't actually care to entertain. Your tears are not welcome here.

      If you love Clemson like you say you do, I suggest you get in touch with Dr. Bruce Ransom, who is a professor in the political science department. He is an excellent man, and a certified expert on this topic. I've taken his class myself. I speak from experience. Send him an email, provide him with this link and your play-play comment, and ask him for a meeting. Ask him if he can explain to you why your counterarguments are bogus, why you can't play off hard historical fact as something "[I] say," and the difference between a pro-Black girl and pro-white man (3 letters: KKK). If you're lucky, he won't be too busy to educate you. Make no qualms about it, sir. You need this education. And Dr. Ransom, when the mood strikes him, is a much more patient teacher than I am.

      The devil doesn't need play-play advocates, Grant. There are enough honest people willing to do his work for him.

      Merry Christmas.

      Delete
  4. There is a right way and a wrong way to have a respectable debate, and that was the wrong way. You did not refute any of my points, you simply pointed me to an expert who could do it for you. Also, you saying that my points are "egregiously ignorant" and that my "tears are not welcome here" is not the way to gain my support for you (I did support you until your response). For example, just because I am a Christian and do not agree with the beliefs of atheists, that does not give me the right to insult them and their beliefs during a debate.

    Debating racism with you is like debating religion with me; no matter what you say, you will not sway my beliefs, and I respect that. However, I am always open for debate and hearing other sides of the argument, whereas you appear to be closed-minded.

    Finally, I may have misunderstood what you were trying to say, but the way I read it is this: you stated that me loving myself and who I am is comparable to being a supporter of the KKK. To that, I simply laugh at the incredible disrespect that you have just displayed. Maybe I'm right or maybe I'm wrong, I suppose I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

    Feel free to reply if you so choose, but I will not see it as this will be my last time visiting your blog.

    Merry Christmas to you as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So sorry you feel that way. I'm also sorry that I just read yet another comment that is about you and your hurt feelings rather than the issue at hand.

      I've given you a start on what you might do to gain much needed understanding of the real problems here. What you choose to do with the solution I've provided is your decision. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink, and I don't *want* to make a grown man do something that he should want to do for his own personal gain. What *I* will not be doing is continuing this...whatever it is with you.

      This is MY online space. I cannot simply log off of it. But you can.

      Delete